While frameworks for critiquing qualitative research exist, they are often complex and more suited to the needs of students engaged in advanced levels . Article A used semi structured interviews which are the most common type of interviews used in qualitative research (Holloway and Wheeler 2010). Article critiquing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written . /Resources 32 0 R Conclusions . expectations as they understood that open wounds take slightly longer to heal. The critical appraisal tool used for assessment of the paper is the 105-112 [Accessed 29 April 2019]. changes and reduced wound infection. These articles were the most recent and linked to the specific choice of topic better than other articles that were found. Different frameworks can be used to critique research articles, the framework which will be used within this assignment is theHolland and Rees (2010) critiquing research framework. 4 0 obj Registered office: Creative Tower, Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE. According to LoBiondo-Wood and Haber (2014) surveys have their advantages and disadvantages. practice. Article A presents various categories from the findings to answer their aim these are; forgotten priority, organisational barriers, attitudinal barriers and barriers to knowledge. Due to these patients not being able to self-report, their pain cannot be properly assessed and treated. Evidence-based nursing is about making clinical decisions using the best available Article B states participants in their study read the cover page of the survey, this provided necessary information for informed consent. A different search strategy would not be used next time as suitable articles were found. 105-112 [Accessed 29 April 2019]. 20 (1), pp. Ellis, P. (2019) Evidence-based practice in nursing, Learning Matters. The reason for choosing ICU nurses for the sample population is due to them having more experience taking care of nonverbal patients. Different frameworks can be used to critique research articles, the framework which will be used within this assignment is the Holland and Rees (2010) critiquing research framework. /Annots [29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R] A waiver of signed informed consent was obtained from both Liberty Universitys and the hospitals Institutional Review Board (IRB). Data was analysed in article A using content analysis method which was performed in line with Graneheim and Lundman (2004). critiquing framework - and adds to the body of nursing knowledge. /Type /Page 6 0 obj Royal College of Nursing (2009). Through the development of a focused research question and search strategy, nurses can select and critique . Deldar, K., Froutan, R. and Ebadi, A. Partners had to work longer hours to maintain the income of the household. intention Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3). Both articles are ethically vigorous due to article B being submitted to the IRB and the researcher undergoing formal IRB training. . Most of the analysis consisted of computing the frequency of certain attitudes, beliefs, or pain assessment practices. This result was also reported by Results Of the 1253 studies screened, 1139 were excluded from abstracts and a further 70 excluded from full text articles. The children also had to live with the shock of a parent Holland & Rees (2010) argued that focus is a major criterion in judging whether the quantitative method applied is appropriate in the context of the research issue concerned, which is again dependent on identifiable measurable variables and the importance of the topic being studied. [Online]. Purposive sampling was used to select participants. Norman, G., Dumville, J., Mohapatra, D., Owens, G. and Crosbie, E. (2016) Farahani et al. The aim or purpose of study is formulated so researchers and readers have a clear understanding about what is being researched (Parahoo, 2014). The participants do however, state there are barriers which can prevent them from carrying out the assessments. There were twenty participants involved in carrying out this research, the participants included nurses working within ICU. Article A used a purposeful sampling method to select participants, this continued until data saturation. The critiquing frameworks enables readers to make a judgement regarding the soundness of the research. Glendinning, C. (2016) Long-term care and austerity in the UK: a growing crisis Questions Appendix 1 and Data Extraction Table Appendix 2. Here you can choose which regional hub you wish to view, providing you with the most relevant information we have for your specific region. /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] Nurse Education Today. /Parent 17 0 R literature International wound journal, 13 (6), pp-1281. The experience of the participants as nurses and as nurses in an intensive care unit ranged from less than two to greater than ten years. confirmatory strategies (Polit and Beck, 2010:10). /Resources 32 0 R . Available at: Holland, K and Rees, C. (2010). (2008) stated that inadequacy of training courses for pain measurement was one of the significant barriers to the use of non-verbal pain assessment scales. These are focus of the study, background, the aim of the study, methodology or approach used, data collection tools, sampling technique, ethical . Article A was also approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, both papers gained informed consent and mentioned confidentiality within their studies. Overall, critiquing a qualitative research article requires a . The first article in this series on understanding research (Lee, 2006a) examined the basic terminology used by researchers and identified that qualitative research produced non-numerical (qualitative) data. /Parent 2 0 R This framework was used because of its rigour and systematic approach to Gordon, DB., Dahl, JL., Miaskowski, C., McCarberg, B., Todd, KH., Paice, JA., Lipman, AG., Bookbinder, M., Sanders, SH. *You can also browse our support articles here >, https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-018-0281-3#Abs1, https://www.nurseeducationtoday.com/article/S0260-6917(03)00151-5/abstract, https://www.iasp-pain.org/Advocacy/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1473, https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/montview/vol3/iss1/4/, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1071/HE15034, https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/nmc-publications/nmc-code.pdf, https://www.rcn.org.uk/professional-development/publications/pub-004984, https://www.rcn.org.uk/professional-development/publications/pub-003138. One difference in findings is that nurses within article A felt the need for pain assessment tools in ICU patients was not necessary, whereas article Bs participants stated their use to be important. Looking at the abstract of the study, one can see the various sections that are consistent with Hek and Moule framework including the background, objectives, study design, settings, participants, methods, findings and conclusions. Kratzke, C. and Cox, C. (2012) Smartphone technology and apps: rapidly changing health promotion Global Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 15(1). Polit and Beck (2010) say rigorous studies that can contribute to evidence-based practice (EBP) should be based on a systematic inquiry that helps develop evidence on problems and challenges that are important to healthcare professionals. The primary data source in phenomenological studies is in-depth conversations. The ecological footprint is a method promoted by the Global Footprint Network to measure human demand on natural capital, i.e. nurses lacked appropriate knowledge, expertise and experience, often requiring This article is a resource for understanding the difference between critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines, and identifying and accessin (2018). stitched. /Group 43 0 R Questions Appendix 1 and Data Extraction Table Appendix 2. This study found that the result was similar to previous research carried out by Rose et al. >> More commonly used existing frameworks tend to have been formulated within the quantitative research paradigm. Get access to all 51 pages and additional benefits: This article, the second in a three-part series on research, explores quantitative research. While frameworks for critiquing qualitative research exist, they are often complex and more suited to the needs of students engaged in advanced levels . The use of technology based communications like mobile. /Contents [19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R] To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have your work published on UKEssays.com then please: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! Referencing and Creative Commons. Show abstract. /F5 28 0 R /Type /Page >> /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] Rose, L., Smith, O., Glinas, C., Haslam, L., Dale, C., Luk, E. and Watt-Watson, J. There were also reports of anxieties 1. . No plagiarism, guaranteed! Holland & Rees: Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Skills Frameworks for critiquing research articles. An overview of the evidence-based practice process for novice researchers. CASP Checklist. From using the Holland and Rees (2010) critiquing framework weaknesses for article A there was no mention within their article of limitations, the study was conducted well and answered the research question. These studies usually involve a small number of participants often ten or fewer according to Polit and Beck (2018), although in article A there were twenty participants. Critical Analysis of Evidence research papers; qualitative and quantitative, using a framework set out by Holland and Rees (2010), and will explore the impact on practice. Coding qualitative data is not an easy task according to Polit and Beck (2018), the researchers may have an issue deciding the right code and must re-read many times to gain the theme of the material. Get in touch. /Contents 48 0 R Study of Nurses Attitudes and Practices towards Pain Evaluation in Nonverbal Patients (2017). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. (2005). (2012). consistent and well-timed, there were reports of patient satisfaction. << /Group 41 0 R perceptions and experiences of living with a surgical wound healing by secondary /ModDate (D:20171214133808Z) A critique is a systematic way of objectively reviewing a piece of research to highlight both its strengths and weaknesses, and its applicability to practice. However, Holloway and Wheeler (2010) state maximum variation is not usually used in qualitative research. endobj /Resources 32 0 R Newson and Lipworth (2000) state it is good research practice and argue research should not be published if approval from a Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) has not been obtained. Critiquing research paper for nursing practitioners emerged due to the . (2015) Technological innovations in mental healthcare: harnessing the digital intention: A qualitative study International journal of nursing studies, 77 , pp-38. This framework has been chosen due to its ability to access online and detail of the questions. There are several strengths of this study. endobj and Beck, C.T., 2010. The critical appraisal tool used for assessment of the paper is the Holland and Rees framework for critiquing qualitative research articles. 3 What are the 3 parts of a critique paper? /F4 27 0 R It is also possible for the participants to not know the official name of the tool they use. Statement of the aim in both papers clearly outlines why the research is being carried out and states what will be done with the findings. A Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to examine the correlation between years of experience of the participant and use of pain assessment tools, as well as between years of experience and perceived importance of the use of assessment tools in the pain assessment of nonverbal patients. Data was analysed using International Business Machines (IBM) Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 24 software. /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] endobj pressure wound therapy, skin grafting, dressings and debridement. Compare and analyze the main concepts and the framework. According toLoBiondo-Wood and Haber (2014)surveys have their advantages and disadvantages. Practicing registered nurses and advance practice nurses must be able to critically appraise and disseminate evidence in order to meet EBP competencies. Free resources to assist you with your nursing studies! 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk. >> Understanding the research process for evidence-based nursing practice 4. >> framework is made up of 12 sections (see Appendix 1). 0. Participants within article A were ensured of data confidentiality and autonomy, confidentiality and data protection. Specific steps for selecting an appropriate tool as well as examples of each tool's use in a publication are provided. >> The way to determine the quality of the research evidence is to subject it to critical appraisal using tools and frameworks like the Hek and Moule framework (Watt, 2018) or rigorous methods and multiple, confirmatory strategies (Polit and Beck, 2010:10). >> Farahani et al. What are the critiquing frameworks for qualitative research trying to do? cavities. This can be contrasted with wounds that are said to heal by primary intention. Br J Nurs. 2018. living with an open surgical wound. Introduction: the professional and practical context of research and evidence based nursing practice 2. the quantity of nature it takes to support people and their economies. Article A presents various categories from the findings to answer their aim these are; forgotten priority, organisational barriers, attitudinal barriers and barriers to knowledge. since 2003, Your NursingAnswers.net purchase is secure and we're rated In another study, Scalise et al (2016) in a different study reported patients The Essay Writing ExpertsUK Essay Experts. The study also showed that surgical wound healing by secondary intention tends to confuse patients, who do not understand why their wound should not be sewn, stitched. >> The studies reviewed were a qualitative study and a quantitative study. /Resources 32 0 R The participants do however, state there are barriers which can prevent them from carrying out the assessments. Providing the best staff, training and medical technologies for treatment of diseases can reduce some of the problems identified in this research, but that comes at a cost (Glendinning, 2016). TheNursing and Midwifery Council (2018)state nurses should alwayspracticein line with the best available evidence, they must make sure advice or information given is evidence-based and maintain the skills and knowledge which is needed for safe and effective practice. The Copyright 2003 - 2023 - UKEssays is a trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab Emirates. /OpenAction [3 0 R /XYZ null null 0] Polit and Beck (2018) state Spearmans correlation is used for correlations between variables measured on an ordinal scale. The primary data source in phenomenological studies is in-depth conversations. Kratzke, C. and Cox, C. (2012) Smartphone technology and apps: rapidly changing Purposive sampling was used to select participants. Aim/Purpose, Research Question or hypothesis, Design of study & methods of data collection used. Available at: Holland, K and Rees, C. (2010). research evidence (Ellis, 2019). What is the hierarchy of evidence in research? tailored to help patients. Negative pressure wound therapy was considered effective as it had reduced dressing changes and reduced wound infection. >> The Holland and Rees framework 2010 describe the sample as a very important stage of the research, this stage can be critically analysed. Different frameworks can be used to critique research articles, the framework which will be used within this assignment is the Holland and Rees (2010) critiquing research framework. Based on the findings found from both articles nurses heavy workload forced nurses to disregard some clinical practices and prevented them from the frequent use of pain assessment tools. endobj Of 19 frameworks in this category (from UK, 12, 35, 47-52 United States, 70-75 Canada, 79-81 Spain 87 and Southern Africa 90), 14 were based on a more or less linear model of a clinical trial and proposed how patient and lay involvement could be woven into it at every stage from writing the proposal to disseminating the findings. Both articles represent patients values and expectations as they state throughout each article the importance of an efficient pain assessment, so the patient is pain free. Participants expressed that they would have preferred healing by primary intention, even if that would have not been in their best interests. Article A attempted to ensure the accuracy of the themes by peer checking the transcripts with two faculty members with a PhD in nursing who were not involved within the study. According to LoBiondo-Wood and Haber (2014) surveys have their advantages and disadvantages. There were thirty-one surveys distributed, only twenty-six were returned, one of the surveys was taken out due to personally identifiable information being included. depression in people who had undergone open wound surgery. endobj Linking Evidence to Action. 5.Cylinders Under Pressure - Thin and Thick Cylinders, Summary Sensation and Perception Chapter 1 - 5, Social Influence 16 markers AQA exam board, Unit 10 - The Human Endocrine and Nervous Systems, Using Gibbs Example of reflective writing in a healthcare assignment, Multiple Choice Questions Chapter 1 What is Economics, Answers - Market Segmentation Activity Worksheet, Lab report - standard enthalpy of combustion, 7. There was no inclusion of exclusion criteria stated within article A. Polit and Beck (2018) state maximum variation sampling is usually the mode of choice in qualitative research as it is useful in illuminating the scope of a phenomenon and in identifying important patterns which may cut across variations. If your specific country is not listed, please select the UK version of the site, as this is best suited to international visitors. /Type /Page Holland and Rees' critique tools. Published: 11th Feb 2020. The chosen articles are of equal quality and provide the same perspectives on pain assessment, they both find supportive findings to each other. Analysis consisted of computing the frequency of certain attitudes, pain assessment practices or beliefs. Why use Holland and Rees critiquing? /Rotate 0 20 (1), pp. /Kids [3 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R] critiquing qualitative studies. All participants were nurses with experience in the ICU setting, nurses experience ranged from less than two to greater than ten years. Essentials of Nursing Research, Methods, 8078. It is possible to critique a piece of research without using a critiquing framework, but the frameworks are very useful for those who are not used to critiquing research. All results are clearly presented within the articles results section, results are presented using tables. The research approach normally influences its design. the Hek and Moule framework (Watt, 2018) or rigorous methods and multiple, This article is a resource for understanding . Nursing research and evidence-based practice skills. /CropBox [0.0 0.0 595.0 842.0] revolution The British Journal of Psychiatry, 206 (4), pp-265. Looking for a flexible role? background, the aim of the study, methodology or approach used, data collection (2018) Evidence-based practice In Clinical Governance in Primary Article Bs data analysis was carried out by using IBM SPSS 24 software which is a statistical analysis through a computer. . Both articles agree with the barriers which prevent nurses carrying out pain assessment efficiently in nonverbal patients, they both have similar findings. 3 The next step is to review the key words. However, there is a crisis of funding in the NHS, so the issue of district nurse time looks to be a serious barrier for the long term, unless staffing improves. brandon bates wxii news; vicky urban dictionary. Use this with a research article so you . skin problems and side-effects from medication for example dizziness and vomiting. A disadvantage of carrying out a survey is the breadth rather than the depth of the information is emphasized. How to Market Your Business with Webinars? /I true Royal College of Nursing (2009). Nurses within article B also considered the use of pain assessment tools as important, compared to article B where nurses stated they did not see them as important for ICU patients. More commonly used existing frameworks tend to have been formulated within the quantitative research paradigm. studies, published in respectable journals. /Pages 2 0 R There is no mention within this study of inclusion or exclusion criteria. /Resources 16 0 R Most of the patients expressed fear and anxiety when they saw the wound. Within article A it is stated maximum variation sampling, member checking, peer questioning and cross-examination were used to ensure the trustworthiness, dependability and credibility of the data respectively. From using the Holland and Rees (2010) critiquing framework weaknesses for article A there was no mention within their article of limitations, the study was conducted well and answered the research question. What is the purpose of a critiquing process? The writers also expressed a need for psychological interventions. This study was conducted using content analysis method in line with Graneheim and Lundman (2004). The study also showed that the participants experienced treatment using negative pressure wound therapy, skin grafting, dressings and debridement. There were also reports of lack of continuity in care because of district nurse variations who sometimes gave conflicting reports about wound progress and, for instance, debridement needs, and unexpected changes to dressing and management regimens. communication of treatment type, especially with regards to debridement which was Find out more, read a sample chapter, or order an inspection copy if you are a lecturer, from the Higher Education website. Due to the most common barrier being nursing workload, unit policy should support the use of assessment tools that are not only supported by research but are also quick and easy to use. research evidence is to subject it to critical appraisal using tools and frameworks like reported as extremely painful (p), resulted in patient frustration. << Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.